FARMGRANT COUNTY FINDER · 3,136 COUNTIES · 6 PUBLIC USDA/FEDERAL DATA SOURCES

County Underserved Score Finder

A descriptive look at how little USDA farm-program support each county receives per acre versus its peers, from public federal data. 619 counties rank as underserved (receiving less USDA support per acre than most). Lower USDA $/acre often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding.

Top 25 Most Underserved Counties (least USDA $/acre vs. peers)
1. Essex County, VT
94
Receives less USDA $/acre than most VT counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
2. Florence County, WI
94
Receives less USDA $/acre than most WI counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
3. Kalkaska County, MI
94
Receives less USDA $/acre than most MI counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
4. Piscataquis County, ME
93
Receives less USDA $/acre than most ME counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
5. Nevada County, CA
93
Receives less USDA $/acre than most CA counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
6. Madison County, MO
92
Receives less USDA $/acre than most MO counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
7. Texas County, MO
91
Receives less USDA $/acre than most MO counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
8. Sheridan County, WY
90
Receives less USDA $/acre than most WY counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
9. Stephens County, GA
90
Receives less USDA $/acre than most GA counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
10. Ravalli County, MT
90
Receives less USDA $/acre than most MT counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
11. Coos County, NH
90
Receives less USDA $/acre than most NH counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
12. Hancock County, TN
89
Receives less USDA $/acre than most TN counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
13. Liberty County, GA
89
Receives less USDA $/acre than most GA counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Elevated beginning-producer presence (108 per 100 farms)
14. Johnson County, WY
89
Receives less USDA $/acre than most WY counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
15. Howell County, MO
88
Receives less USDA $/acre than most MO counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
16. Okfuskee County, OK
88
Receives less USDA $/acre than most OK counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
17. Bennington County, VT
88
Receives less USDA $/acre than most VT counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
18. Johnson County, TN
87
Receives less USDA $/acre than most TN counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
19. Adams County, ID
87
Receives less USDA $/acre than most ID counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
20. Dent County, MO
87
Receives less USDA $/acre than most MO counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
21. Oregon County, MO
87
Receives less USDA $/acre than most MO counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
22. Bayfield County, WI
87
Receives less USDA $/acre than most WI counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
23. Coos County, OR
87
Receives less USDA $/acre than most OR counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
24. Putnam County, FL
86
Receives less USDA $/acre than most FL counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
25. Ferry County, WA
86
Receives less USDA $/acre than most WA counties — often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land, not unclaimed funding. · Rural (non-metro) county
Browse by State
Alaska 0 avg · 0 counties Alabama 52 avg · 66 counties Arkansas 55 avg · 67 counties Arizona 54 avg · 15 counties California 52 avg · 55 counties Colorado 55 avg · 54 counties Connecticut 54 avg · 7 counties Delaware 40 avg · 3 counties Florida 55 avg · 63 counties Georgia 50 avg · 133 counties Hawaii 60 avg · 2 counties Iowa 36 avg · 99 counties Idaho 57 avg · 43 counties Illinois 37 avg · 102 counties Indiana 39 avg · 92 counties Kansas 45 avg · 105 counties Kentucky 50 avg · 103 counties Louisiana 48 avg · 53 counties Massachusetts 51 avg · 11 counties Maryland 48 avg · 23 counties Maine 67 avg · 13 counties Michigan 48 avg · 72 counties Minnesota 45 avg · 84 counties Missouri 49 avg · 111 counties Mississippi 52 avg · 80 counties Montana 55 avg · 55 counties North Carolina 50 avg · 92 counties North Dakota 46 avg · 53 counties Nebraska 50 avg · 93 counties New Hampshire 64 avg · 8 counties New Jersey 44 avg · 15 counties New Mexico 53 avg · 31 counties Nevada 58 avg · 13 counties New York 55 avg · 50 counties Ohio 46 avg · 88 counties Oklahoma 55 avg · 77 counties Oregon 57 avg · 35 counties Pennsylvania 53 avg · 64 counties Rhode Island 51 avg · 4 counties South Carolina 47 avg · 44 counties South Dakota 46 avg · 66 counties Tennessee 54 avg · 87 counties Texas 51 avg · 252 counties Utah 54 avg · 29 counties Virginia 52 avg · 91 counties Vermont 65 avg · 14 counties Washington 55 avg · 32 counties Wisconsin 46 avg · 69 counties West Virginia 55 avg · 17 counties Wyoming 59 avg · 23 counties

How the Underserved Score Works

The Underserved Score (0–100) is a descriptive, relative measure of how little USDA farm-program support a county has historically received per acre compared with other counties. It is built from three public-data components: USDA Support Gap (recorded USDA dollars per acre vs. other counties in the state), Producer Priority (beginning, women, veteran producers and rural classification per 100 farms — the groups USDA set-asides are written for), and Insurance Coverage Gap (crop-insurance policy density and loss history vs. peers). The composite is published only when all three components have data. A higher score means the county receives less USDA support per acre than its peers — which often reflects pasture, specialty, or non-commodity land use, not unclaimed funding. It is not a measure of need, deservedness, or eligibility, and it does not predict that any farm will receive funding. Sources: USDA NASS, RMA, ERS, and EWG records.